Scholarly record
THE FORMATION OF MODERN NATIONS SEEN THROUGH THE LENS OF RELEVANT PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
Through employing a comparative perspective, major components of the intellectual contribution of Barrington Moore and Max Weber are presented; both of them made a unique contribution to the explanation of the formation of modern nations under capitalist conditions resulting from the interdependence of culture, industrialization and the transformation of social structures. First, Moore's and Weber's reasoning about the emergence of modern capitalism is clarified; while Moore ascribes crucial importance to social differentiation and the configuration of social classes for the emergence of democratic and non-democratic versions of capitalism in the most significant national systems, Weber stresses the role of religion ? particularly the moral imperative of various Protestant sects for the emergence of capitalist structures. Second, differences between these two authors concerning the constitution of concepts are presented; while Moore without explanation employed general notions such as democracy, dictatorship, revolution and social class, Weber's methodology asserted the importance of cultural phenomena and the subjective meaning of values implying the constitution and employment of ideal types. Third, key components of the intellectual contribution of Barrington Moore and Max Weber to the explanation of capitalism and the methodology of social sciences are highlighted (including the contribution of Gale Stokes as regards the limited explanatory force of Moore's model for small Central and East European nations); on the basis of the comparative analysis Weber's methodology is more positively assessed.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References13
Hroch, M., Comparative Studies in Modern European History: Nation, Nationalism, Social Change, United Kingdom, 2007, pp. 91−110.
Oakes, G., Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences, United Kingdom, 1988, pp. 111−152.
Moore, B.; Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, United States, 2003, pp. 413−508.
Skocpol, T ; A Critical Review of Barrington Moore's Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Politics and Society, United States, vol. 4/issue 1, 1973, pp. 1 – 34.
Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism, United States, 1958, pp. 13 – 31.
Parkin, F., Max Weber, United Kingdom, 2002, pp. 40 – 70.
Bendix, R., Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, United States, 1977, pp. 13−79.
Stokes, G., The Social Origins of East European Politics, East European Politics and Societies, United States, vol.1/issue 1, 1986, pp. 30−74.
Hroch, M., Writing National History for Small Nations, Studies on National Movements, Belgium, vol.1/issue 1, 2013, pp. 7− 16.
Auty, R., Language and Society in the Czech National Revival, The Slavonic and East European Review, United Kingdom, vol. 35/issue 84, 1956, pp. 241−248.
Šulíková, J., Unintended Revelations in History Textbooks: The Precarious Authenticity and Historical Continuity of the Slovak Nation, Journal of Social Science Education, Germany, vol.15/issue 3, 2016, pp. 26–39.
Kalberg, S., Max Weber's Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History, American Journal of Sociology, United States, vol. 85/issue 5, 1980, pp. 1145−1149.
Aronovitch, Z., Interpreting Weber's Ideal−Types, Philosophy and Social Sciences, United States, vol. 42/issue 3, 2012, pp. 356 – 369.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
