Scholarly record
COGNITIVE COMPETENCE, SCIENTIFIC THINKING, APPROACH TO STUDYING AS THE PREDICTORS OF THE CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL THINKING IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Abstract
The aim of study was to find predictors of psychological critical thinking in university students. We have hypothesed that the main factors which could predict the level of critical psychological thinking will be cognitive competence, scientific thinking, learning approach, and academic achievement. As methods of data gathering were used the self-referencing techniques (Lawson’s test of psychological critical thinking, Magno’s scientific thinking inventory, Approaches to Studying Inventory developed by Tait, Entwistle, & McCune) and objective test (Blinkhorn’s Graduate and Managerial Assessment, verbal subtest). The participants were recruited from the psychology departments of two universities in East Slovakia (N = 156; 75 % were students of psychology, 25 % students of English language, 8,5 % were male; average age: 23,2 years). The statistical analysis conducted by Statistica yielded results confirming that the most strong predictors of psychological critical thinking were the cognitive competence, strategic learning approach, as well as the academic achievement. The significant differences have been revealed in the level of critical thinking due to the year of study. The educational and consulting implications were also discussed in the study.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
Bensley, D. A. & Murtagh, M. P. Guidelines for scientific approach to critical psychological thinking assessment, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 39, 2012, pp 5-16.
Blinkhorn, S. Graduate and Managerial Assessment Manual and User Guide. Dorset Press, Dorchester, 1985.
Facione, P. A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Experts Consensus for Purposes of Assessment and Instruction. Research findings and reccommendations, American Philosophical Association, Newark, 1990.
Kollárik, T. et al. Assessment of managerial capabilities. Manual [Hodnotenie managerskych predpokladov. Príručka.] Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy, 1993.
Lawson, T. J. Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 26, pp 207-209, 1999.
Magno, C. A Measure for Scientific Thinking, The International Journal of Education and Psychological Assessment, vol. 6, 2010, 1, pp 71-86.
Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D. N. & Smith, E. E. The Teaching of Thinking, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J. & McCune, V. ASSIST: a reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (ed.) Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, 1998.
Williams, R. L., Oliver, R. & Stockdale, S. Psychological versus generic critical thinking as predictors and outcome measures in a large undergraduate human development course, The Journal of General Education, vol. 53, 2004, pp 37-58.
Dunbar, K. Scientific thinking and its development. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 1999, pp 730-733. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Rychen, D.S. & Salganik, L.H. (Eds.). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber, 2003.
Mesárošová, M., Mesároš, P., & Mesároš, F. Key competencies for knowledge society II: Analysis of levels of cognitive skills. Economics and Business Management, [Ekonomika a manažment podniku] vol. 7/issue 2, 2009, pp 23-33,.
Mesárošová, M., & Mesároš, F. Verbal and Mathematical Competencies of University Students as Predictor of the Success in Knowledge Society, International Journal of Arts and Sciences, vol. 4, 2011, pp 244-251.
Mesárošová, M., Mesároš, F., & Mesároš, P. Key Competencies of University Students: Learning Competence and its Relationship to Verbal and Mathematical Competence (Kľúčové kompetencie vysokoškolských študentov: učebná kompetencia a jej vzťah k verbálnej a matematickej kompetencii ). Československá psychologie, vol. 56, 2012, 2, pp 106-118.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
